Site-Global vs Account-Level Identity Verification in QCDS

Choose centralized administrator-owned provider settings versus sender-account credentials, understand global override behavior for new Requests, and preserve provider binding on existing sent transactions.

This guide applies to Pro / Max / All Access and follows the accepted QC Digital Signature 2.0.7 implementation. Where older walkthrough language differs from the current interface or source behavior, use the current QCDS state as the authority.

Before You Begin

  • Treat the signer link as personal transaction access. Do not publish, forward, or paste it into public support posts.
  • If Level 2 Identity Verification is required, confirm the applicable Didit or Shufti provider profile is configured and tests successfully before sending.
  • Test the signer experience in a normal browser/mobile context, not only while logged into Joomla as an administrator.

Step-by-Step Workflow

  1. Open the secure signer link in the intended signer/browser context.
  2. Complete any required Identity Verification step before signing if the Request requires it.
  3. Work through the assigned fields and correct any allowed signer information carefully.
  4. Submit only after all required fields are complete.
  5. Verify the resulting signer status and, when applicable, the next routing/completion step.

Choose centralized administrator-owned provider settings versus

Level 2 Identity Verification is additional provider-backed assurance, available with eligible Pro/Max/All Access entitlement. Current QCDS 2.0.7 supports Didit and Shufti. Site-global settings can provide an installation-wide provider profile; sender/account settings can provide an account-level profile where the global configuration is not overriding it. Ordinary secure-link signing remains separate, so a provider outage affects signers who were specifically required to verify rather than making every QCDS transaction provider-dependent.

For Site-Global vs Account-Level Identity Verification in QCDS, verify this behavior using the actual object involved rather than a generic assumption. A global administrator setting, a sender-workspace preference, a reusable Template, and a sent Request have different ownership and history rules. QCDS is intentionally designed so changes for future work do not silently rewrite the evidence of an already-sent transaction.

Global override behavior for new Requests

Level 2 Identity Verification is additional provider-backed assurance, available with eligible Pro/Max/All Access entitlement. Current QCDS 2.0.7 supports Didit and Shufti. Site-global settings can provide an installation-wide provider profile; sender/account settings can provide an account-level profile where the global configuration is not overriding it. Ordinary secure-link signing remains separate, so a provider outage affects signers who were specifically required to verify rather than making every QCDS transaction provider-dependent.

For Site-Global vs Account-Level Identity Verification in QCDS, verify this behavior using the actual object involved rather than a generic assumption. A global administrator setting, a sender-workspace preference, a reusable Template, and a sent Request have different ownership and history rules. QCDS is intentionally designed so changes for future work do not silently rewrite the evidence of an already-sent transaction.

And preserve provider binding on existing sent transactions

Level 2 Identity Verification is additional provider-backed assurance, available with eligible Pro/Max/All Access entitlement. Current QCDS 2.0.7 supports Didit and Shufti. Site-global settings can provide an installation-wide provider profile; sender/account settings can provide an account-level profile where the global configuration is not overriding it. Ordinary secure-link signing remains separate, so a provider outage affects signers who were specifically required to verify rather than making every QCDS transaction provider-dependent.

How This Fits into the QCDS Workflow

Ordinary QCDS signing is a secure-link workflow and does not require the signer to have a Joomla account. Identity Verification is an additional assurance layer for selected transactions; it does not replace the core signing system.

Signer usability and evidence quality are linked. Clear field placement, private secure-link handling, and explicit Identity Verification requirements make it easier for the signer to complete the intended act without ambiguous workarounds.

Verify the Result

  • Request Details shows the expected lifecycle, participant, Timeline, and delivery state after the action.
  • Provider Test Connection succeeds and a representative Level 2 test follows the expected provider flow.
  • A direct follow-up test confirms the change affects future/current workflow behavior without rewriting historical sent Request evidence.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Cancelling/recreating an otherwise valid Request just to repair one failed email address.
  • Leaving transient unsent work and expecting it to appear later as a persistent draft Request.
  • Treating provider-backed Identity Verification as required for every ordinary secure-link signing workflow.
  • Posting provider credentials, webhook secrets, or identity evidence in public diagnostics.

Troubleshooting

  • If Level 2 verification fails, use the provider Test Connection and inspect provider/profile/callback configuration; ordinary Level 1 signing and historical evidence should not be reset.
  • If the Request is partly successful, preserve it and repair the failed participant/delivery step. Successful links and recorded history should remain usable.

Operational Best Practice

Test meaningful changes with controlled data before relying on them in production. Keep QCDS, Joomla mail, Scheduled Tasks, and entitlement health observable; preserve successful Requests and completed evidence; and make the smallest change that solves the actual problem. For handoff or support, record the QCDS version, relevant Request/Template reference, the exact action taken, and the visible result without including secrets.


Community Discussion

Want to compare workflows, share practical tips, or discuss how you use this QCDS feature? Visit the QC Digital Signature Community. For private support, bug reports, account-specific issues, or feature requests, use the QuantaCade support system.